A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
某位好友让我看蜘蛛侠3前补一下这个电影，看完觉得她应该直接说让我补彩蛋，何苦要花这一个半小时的时间呢
倘若漫威与索尼这场公开媾和能够被具象成色情片，也定是无聊透顶的全年龄向。
1、毒液的血液被坏人吃了诞生了反派毒液然后毒液击败了反派毒液的老套故事。2、毒液走的是萌货人设啊。3、彩蛋里毒液舔屏小蜘蛛可还行，做出了老阿姨们都会做的事。
不搞笑，不精彩，没高潮，没新意，洛逻辑也不自洽，像是为了赶时间草草拍出来的烂片，呃，不是像是，而是就是。
全片最让人兴奋的地方应该就是彩蛋了，但配合上这极度乏味的正片，这彩蛋反而会产生质疑: 这么玩下去真的还会精彩吗…
扒掉超英题材的伪装，本质就是同性伴侣的吵架琐事，看汤姆·哈迪自己和自己吵架。反派无论是那对亡命男女，还是逆子“屠杀”，都没交代清楚能力来源和行动目的，因为定位就是不重要，只作为给毒液夫妇破镜重圆的一个契机而已。拍了一部下来，原地转了一圈，什么都没推进。好在正片只90分钟片长，不算太长。
这片子怎么给我感觉是制片人发飙，痛骂导演无能拍摄出很多不能用的素材，然后又没有考虑到院线排片，最后便开始虐杀剪辑师，剪辑点凑总复杂给叙事瓣蒜，前一场戏感觉还没完呢，后一场直接就去你妈的吧！有种当年看阿弗莱克的夜魔侠之感，剧情故事太薄弱无趣了，片方倒是真倾听了观众的心声，把汤老师和毒液彻底相爱相杀的组成了死对儿，其实就差去领证了，伍迪哈里森硕果仅存的好演员之一，看他在本片中真是全程尴尬，干嘛要接这种傻逼角色？明明都可以功成名就的退休回归家庭了，便要给自己留下这么一笔，整体而言比第一部要混乱不堪，没头没尾的就这么一个故事，而且它的核心内容是那种极其地低幼式的认知，看了就让你赶紧给我闭嘴吧！
其他的就一团稀烂了。
故事很仓促，结局无厘头，彩蛋是正片，看得出是赶鸭子上架的电影，希望它的牺牲可以带来更精彩的蜘蛛宇宙~！！！
看了，又仿佛没看，第一部我本就不喜欢，第二部几乎是第一部的糟糕重置，角色的扁平化处理，事件的顺理成章压缩时长，特效的粗枝大叶，而铺垫宇宙与续集的心思倒是不少...
Awkward，一个科幻超英拍的又散又碎，喜怒哀乐想到啥拍啥，开头还以为是看“恐怖悬疑X战警”，节奏氛围十分不着调！乍一看还以为是汤姆哈迪和毒液脱口秀，相比于第一部的惊艳，这一部太让人失望了！
love story显然不该是烂片的遮羞布
令人意外的是女主未婚夫也不是那么没用
作为一个喜剧片，至少让我笑了，毒液的个性挺萌的，和小甜心俩人的拌嘴日常倒也能看得下去。导演可真喜欢让Woody Harrelson演Bonnie and Clyde这种戏码。
完全成爱情动作喜剧片了，这剧情拍了跟没拍一样，彩蛋那么一会儿的劲儿比整部电影强
上一部本来故事就很蠢，但是靠着合体的奇妙化学反应撑起了全片。这一部两人的合体没有任何新意，甚至比上一部差太多，然后再套上一个观众起码已经看过十遍的故事，真是难看死了。
警察利物浦口音讲美音太可爱了。居然有二册，演路人甲神父
比1差远了。故事没讲清楚，反派塑造极其糟糕，细节粗糙如儿戏
外星人为GLBT发声，可以说是非常讲究政治正确的电影了。
低能儿的智力游戏。为啥没事要往高处爬？你是金刚么？安迪·瑟金斯还是猴子演多了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
