Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
说起来影片中的母亲很多台词真的太像我妈了，都是以母爱为名的道德绑架。但是很多事情她们错了就是错了，不能因为得病而而抹杀掉以爱为名行偷窥之事的行径。我妈也是365天以爱为名的监视，真的窒息。。。影片后程一直在抹眼泪，也希望妈妈们能有自己的生活，不要天天束缚儿女了。
过程是有点综艺化了，不太像正经电影，哪怕是爆米花电影
毫无感情的流水线作品。唯一的亮点是“范迪塞尔试戏《猫》的视频真实存在”。
三个人之间的化学反应如同道恩强森的头一样，毫-无。
说实话真的好没意思啊，完全可以看困的片，剧情不用猜都知道，结尾虽然有小反转但也是意料之中，这么各司其职的标签也太明显了，也是给三位目前最红的大咖来个聚会吧
6.5/10 分。初看。剧情实在没有啥惊喜，老掉牙的套路了。。。小贱贱走不出这样的角色了。。。真的还不如当年狂轰滥炸贝贝佳的《鬼影特攻：以暴制暴》。。。
后面的反转其实很生硬，再加上提到前苏联、俄罗斯监狱，我甚至不知道为什么要特地去伦敦一趟，最后还要出续集，这比喜剧小品还要糟糕。
还想重温八年前《富春山居图》的感动吗？《红色通缉令》可以满足你。看到巨石强森和瑞恩·雷诺兹立马脑部回《速度与激情：特别行动》，以致于以为《红色通缉令》是前者的番外篇。三个角色都有点定型了，但是瑞恩·雷诺兹的滑稽表演还是让这部电影挽回那么一丁点口碑，两星半。
尖峰时刻2 ，杀死比尔，导演一定很爱这两部。
后面的反转其实很生硬，再加上提到前苏联、俄罗斯监狱，我甚至不知道为什么要特地去伦敦一趟，最后还要出续集，这比喜剧小品还要糟糕。
7/10.
脱离了某些特定剧情和剧情相关设定，话唠属性并不适合所有角色。
5分。网飞超强阵容网络大电影。盖尔·加朵、瑞安·雷诺兹、巨石强森三个大明星在一部电影里演戏给你看，还要啥自行车？看看不太精彩的打斗，没有新意的剧情，不合逻辑的动机，神出鬼没的角色，当你要换台或者要睡着时，看到加朵所有不爽一扫而光。当然了，小贱贱也还是很可爱的。最不喜欢的是，巨石强森居然和加朵有吻戏。剧情上完全没有这个必要，而且他俩没有一点CP感。对了，黄老板客串挺有意思。
和死侍一二中间插了一二百个自由人，集齐三巨头各自在新冠贡献烂大片，惊觉他们一个个个真的没离花瓶多远，而且都还不如肌肉拿破仑靓骚。说明像样的剧情和特效起码要有一个，反转完全是为了讲你朝笑话？光靠贱贱犯贱完全不够，可能上下铺是最佳
【原來素雞特別行動的奇怪友誼起源在這裡】
就是十分工业化的流水线爆米花电影…为了反转而反转，三个人没有啥cp感，各演各的。加朵真美，我爱美女，美女贴贴！结尾感觉是要再拍个流水线2吗？
王炸卡司，稀烂剧情，既无逻辑又无趣，Ryan Reynolds是从小贱贱中走不出来了。
标准爆米花电影，各种元素都有一点，虽然有点流水线剧本的意思，不过就冲着这三人组，我依然期待续集。
结局安排稍微还是让糯米滋这边气势弱了一点，没找回场子啊！
悬崖之上火箭炮脱狱，密室冷兵器一女抽二男兼侏罗纪斗牛，《低俗小说》手表南美纳粹地堡飞车，想看云迪素的《猫》试镜录像 : )热热闹闹挺好看
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
