Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
对不起我一直在笑 怎么感情戏写的这么生硬啊哈哈哈哈哈哈虽然男女主很配 女主闺蜜和男主弟弟的cp还更好嗑一点 可能是留白比较多遐想空间很大 全片看下来我只想感叹真是如狼似虎的年纪………
可怕的老梗烂梗综合片，难看的古老青春片人设大杂烩。
被其他影评骗了，说有一半的片长都在。。。结果，尺度还没古装片大，忍了俩小时就看给我看这个。。。气到了。
男主寸头真的太帅了！第一次觉得原来寸头也能这么帅！此剧是颜狗天堂
富家坏公子和邻家乖女孩的青春恋爱故事，没记错的话十年前就不流行了，有点土，但帅是真的帅
卖拷贝终于又回归了一次严肃题材，虽然是改编丹麦同名电影，但是运镜、场面、调度都梦回《变形金刚》。老吉继《罪人》后第二次演翻牌电影，虽然丹尼这个角色本色是很俗套的，但被老吉演的亦正亦邪，精彩无比。总体来说是卖拷贝近些年来不错的商业片，仅次于《危机13小时》和《付出与收获》。
反正就是说和wifi关系不大和太阳之子倒是有点关系
如拉项链，吻大腿，接吻，把张力拉满，如果把剧情设置在大学，我可能更吃这一套，但有点介怀他们的年龄，总让我觉得他们还小。
1🌟给男主颜值1🌟给女主颜值1🌟给不带脑子看的我
上一次看男主女主一凑近就呼哧带喘还是暮光之城，这回我以为男主就算不是个妖怪也得有啥绝症才会如此欲擒故纵若即若离反覆无常；结果他只是家风如此外加氯气过敏…
en……纯爱电影也不能出现侮辱智商的剧情！
好扯淡，即使是帅哥美女也想看稍微合逻辑一点的恋爱（意思是说能不能把感情变化刻画细致一点）但是冲男女主美好肉体决定多给一颗星
超级玛丽苏 神秘迷人有钱但有心理创伤所以从不谈恋爱的帅哥邻居有一天黑了你的电脑只为蹭你家的Wi-Fi&穷但有自尊心拥有超级大备胎的邻家小妹
一路鬼扯的剧情，但结尾真的升华了。不得不佩服好莱坞的编剧。
Si es muy rico Ares, pero por favoor, llamáis a eso "chica callada e introvertida" en España? Ni se puede decir friki... Menudos cojones...
也算old school boom boom boom吧。虽然剧本弱但是爆破强哈~1080P 22/04/25
虽然也看过很多离谱的欧美青春片了，这个还是让我大开眼界，不过男女主颜值实在太高了让人能坚持下去，剧情嘛就是毫无逻辑一通乱写（原来国外玛丽苏小说就这水平吗）
有点封神，如果不是男主身材实在抱歉不然可以冲击一下五十度灰在我心里的位置
逻辑简直不合理 多给一星完全为了男主跟男二的颜 说实话男二更好啊明明
这么骚气的发型都蛮帅的
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
