硬中华真假

硬中华真假 高清

评分：
9.0 推荐

分类： 喜剧片 1995

导演： 西里斯科什·慕克吉

立即播放 报错
排序

播放地址

剧情介绍

　　喜剧，讲一个男人通过装假胡子装扮成兄弟两个人，周旋于女友和未来岳父之间，因为岳父喜欢有胡子的人，认为有胡子的人成熟稳重。
　　Ramprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma (Amol Palekar) is looking for a better paying job. He and his sister Ratna (Manju Singh) have no relatives or acquaintances except Dr. Kedar (David). Dr.Kedar tells him about Bhavani Shankar's (Utpal Dutt) firm known as Urmila Traders. Shankar is a weird man. He is a man of traditional values, hence he naturally hates youth wearing modern clothes. He is a sports fan, but thinks lowly of youth knowing anything about sports. But his most weird trait is hatred towards men without moustaches. He thinks that men without moustaches are characterless.
　　Ramprasad has a moustache. He takes care of other problems by wearing kurta & feigning ignorance about sports. Bhavani hires him immediately. Ram is a hardworking guy, so Bhavani (& Ram) have no problems. However, Ram once takes leave by pretending that his mother (who died many years ago) has taken ill, and goes to watch a hockey match. Bhavani Shankar, who also attended the match, sees him there.
　　The next day Bhavani summons Ramprasad to his office and asks him about the Hockey match. Remembering the plot of a movie a friend of his is shooting, Ram convinces Bhavani Shankar that he had seen his "moustache-less" identical twin Lucky (alias Lakshmanprasad Dashrathprasad Sharma) at the stadium.
　　Bhavani Shankar buys his argument & feels bad about accusing him and decides to make amends by hiring Lucky to teach his daughter Urmila (Bindiya Goswami) music. Ramprasad reluctantly shaves his moustache to become Lucky and starts to teach music to Urmila. He is helped by his actor friend Deven Verma (playing himself).
　　Now Urmila aka Urmi is the exact opposite of her father. She takes immediate liking to Lucky, while Ram is barely noticed by her. Bhavani notices this & gives Ram another job to tutor on the pretext of her exams. Meanwhile, Mrs. Srivastav (Dina Pathak), a socialite, is roped to play the part of Ram, "Lakshman" & Ratna's mother. Like Ram, she also ends up playing her own twin in front of Bhavani.
　　Ram decides to tell Urmila the truth. Urmila tells him to tell the truth to Bhavani as well. Ram goes to Bhavani to tell the truth, but Bhavani sees Ram's moustache giving away. Bhavani exposes Ram, but ends up thinking that Lucky murdered Ram & impersonated him to marry Urmila.
　　In a hilarious chase that follows, Bhavani ends up totalling a police jeep. The Senior Inspector (Om Prakash) mistakes him for a thug named Pascal D'Costa & is about to lock him up in the jail. Only when his Inspector identifies Bhavani Shankar by his real identity is he freed. By now, a harried Bhavani has developed hatred for twin as well.
　　On coming home, he finds that Urmila & Lucky are married. He refuses to give them blessings, until Dr.Kedar comes to the scene & explains the whole situation. Now, Bhavani becomes even more furious, but on everybody's insistence, relents. The film ends with a family photo of Mrs.Srivastav, Ratna, Urmila, Ram, Dr.Kedar, Bhavani's sister Kalindi (Shubha Khote) & Bhavani (who is shown without moustache).

猜你喜欢

评论:

  • 乌孙雪卉 8小时前 :

    太长了 中世纪女权片 可看性跟罗生门差远了 男性什么时候能站起来~ 大本的造型很另类 这片票房失利很正常 不要抬头不应该啊

  • 吕思雅 2小时前 :

    雷利·史考特執導戰爭電影就是一把手的工匠等級，營造的恢弘壯烈場面一向有目共睹，最後那場壓軸的決鬥，令人看得呼吸都要停止；但另一方面，他對於探究心理層面的細膩之處就略顯不足，光靠繁複的台詞是難以完整表現吧。

  • 俊妍 3小时前 :

    一部女权电影竟然比《天国王朝》和《角斗士》都他妈好看。

  • 堵子明 7小时前 :

    多重视角叙述用在电影里原来是这种效果，还是有些不必要却又免不了的重复。想起昆德拉的玩笑。

  • 岚月 4小时前 :

    600多年前和现在，并无两样，从来不缺觉醒者，不缺“伪君子”，不缺默默隐忍者…有了互联网，大家变成“键盘骑士”，在线上“决斗”，无关生死，一场输了，换个评论区，继续…

  • 凡子 8小时前 :

    很稳，也很无聊。在拍摄有不同素材的情况下，仍在三重视角的前述叙事中没有明显的差异化，在以悬念牵动走向的类型预期下，这样的执行效果可能还不如《金刚川》。

  • 古添智 4小时前 :

    同一事件的真相从当事者三人的角度各自讲了一遍，只有女主所代表的章节才是真的真相。可以说是罗生门式的叙事，从某种意义上讲也是金刚川式的。

  • 从宏朗 9小时前 :

    “You're not doing this for me. ”如果说这是一部女权作品，那这句话需要向更多人呐喊出声。如果实在要说有什么被唤醒了，大概是结局升官发财死老公吧。

  • 却丝琦 5小时前 :

    上次让我有这种感觉的是巩皇

  • 捷文宣 4小时前 :

    朱迪演得好啊

  • 希和煦 5小时前 :

    ——你想我吗？——我很想你。——那我们上床吧。被伯爵玩弄的两个将军。男人养家真命苦。简单粗暴的叙事。

  • 伟乐巧 0小时前 :

    本来以为分成3个章节，能给我们3个主观视角，没想到都是一样的，很多涉及多人场景的镜头都是重复的。。还以为至少能做出The Affair的感觉。。。

  • 力亦凝 8小时前 :

    本片的优点集结于展示男性对于自身以及自我行为的臆想性美化，将女性当作财产以及生育工具的麦迪文和风流并觉得“No means Yes"的司机的视角中从来只有自己，嘲讽二人伪善。但三条线的信息差很小，主要是展现不同的情绪，因此重复的观感并不算好。很理解为什么老雷要特地标出真相，但这从纯文本角度出发是很无力的一次标记。

  • 尾绮梦 3小时前 :

    英雄气质和史诗向来由男性写就，道德同样也是。但这个电影说，最勇敢的或许不是可以选择“为荣誉而战”的人，而是几乎没有选择权、却能够在逼近的死亡面前站稳脚跟的人。

  • 卓嘉 3小时前 :

    我真是不懂为什么要用罗生门的拍法来讲女性遭受的不公？罗生门的拍法不就是每个人都在说谎吗？你最后抹去truth或者抹去玛格丽特的truth任何一个就好，直接就是某个人的视角就是truth，不是这么玩儿的呀老爷子。结构上的鸡贼，内容上的讨巧，某人的视角就是truth，你要女性叙事为什么非要搞几乎平行的罗生门结构？女性叙述不配你的客观叙述吗？弄一个玛格丽特的真相就是真相嵌套在罗生门结构里，谁信呀？有意思吗？吗？吗？还不如看本马特搞基。

  • 封晓曼 0小时前 :

    毕竟雷导，服化道赞，中世纪米兔，不如处女作

  • 匡芳馥 8小时前 :

    中世纪的奇情、粗野和虚伪，表现的恰到好处，真相关乎荣誉，从来与正义难容。

  • 典飞龙 5小时前 :

    出人意料，第三段的女性视角将一个平淡的故事升华出了女权主义思想

  • 旗玲玲 2小时前 :

    三个视角的叙事其实不存在什么罗生门，强奸一直存在，丈夫的眼里自己是完完全全的受害者，虽然一直生不出儿子，但妻子作为自己的财产受到了侵犯，强奸犯自始自终不认为自己的行为是强奸，曾经的受害者选择做帮凶反倒指责站出来反抗的人是错的，不在乎真相只想追求刺激的旁观者。阴沉的天色也掩盖不住油画般的美，三段完全相同的时间和事件，叙事丝毫没有重复，选角与人物形象高度契合，结束的干净利落。结局值得鼓掌，但八百年后的今天，这些令人作呕的事件依然在发生，没有任何改变。

  • 图门语蕊 0小时前 :

    很喜欢雷神，但这部作品并不出彩。将女权的问题放在了中世纪，将女性刻画得足够丰富复杂。但故事叙述也有问题，不同视角叙述可以展现事情另一面，但是稍显拖沓，同样的情节重复并没有给观众展现出足够的差异，因此会觉得重复疲惫。可决斗戏拍得足够精彩，依然是雷神水准。

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved