Umberto Lenzi is undoubtedly the king of Italian crime movies, but unfortunately; Syndicate Sadists is not the best examples of his work in this genre. Lenzi's crime flicks tend to be a cut above the rest because he makes films based on stories with a point, and they don't lack direction; but this film feels a bit too wayward to fully fit with the rest of his stuff. The film takes obvious influence from Sergio Leone's landmark western 'A Fistful of Dollars' (which in turn, took influence from Akira Kurosawa's landmark samurai flick Yojimbo), in that it features two warring families and a strong character at the centre. The crime that Lenzi focuses on is kidnapping, and we centre on a character called 'Rambo'. Rambo is dragged into the war between the two families after his brother is killed because of it. Rambo uses his brains and brawn to pit the two families against one another, in the hope of gaining revenge for his brother's death, rescuing a young boy that they've kidnapped, and ultimately letting the two sides destroy one another.
The film's biggest asset is undoubtedly Tomas Milian. Milian was put to great use by Lenzi in almost all of his crime thrillers. The range of characters he has played for Lenzi is immense, and this one is easily one of the coolest. The character is called Rambo, which immediately sprang to mind the popular Sylvester Stallone character - but for once, the Italians actually haven't stolen this name as Syndicate Sadists was released first! As usual, the film is wickedly entertaining, as we get to watch Milian get himself involved in the usual array of car chases, shootouts and brawls. Lenzi has got him riding a motorbike this time round, and every scene featuring it and Milian is a real standout! However, the film often feels like it doesn't really have anywhere to go, and this means that the running time is stretched out more than it should be. Compared to the crime films of other Italian directors, Syndicate Sadists is more than above average; but in relation to Lenzi crime flicks such as Almost Human and The Cynic, The Rat and The Fist - it doesn't stand tall as one of Lenzi's best. Still, if you're looking for ninety minutes of testosterone fuelled mayhem - Syndicate Sadists will suffice!
也不知道怎么就看完了，这得是多无聊能看完这部电影、看了个寂寞
小k演的很棒～最爱的是丽莎饰演的虚拟的，代表所有关心戴安娜的角色
沿着正确的集体回忆向前推导，难度系数自降为零，再这样束手束脚地拍下去，拉雷恩离广告导演不远了。
用很多细节展现戴安娜对自由的向往，音乐和画面都很考究，不错的一部作品。
这评分，个人觉得不太合理。结局挺俗的电影，后半段有些桥段虽爽但濫。但是除了俩人吵架那段我觉得演过了，作为轻喜剧完成度很高，剧情流畅程度吊打国内九成电影。看完觉得有惊喜，五星表示对优映文化的支持
到仓库之前的剧情幼稚，台词尴尬，连打架斗殴都拍得很假，而且剧情抑得太过分了，让人膈应。仓库之后的剧情开始精彩纷呈，又回到了他们团队熟悉的解密风格，且剧情在线，还用上了之前的一些铺垫。感觉前面就是个两星片儿，后面值得四星，有点可惜，有点难受。
不如彻底一点，做成Mother!那样的惊悚片。/指匠情挑之后，Sally Hawkins又爱女人了，Hooray！
影片以迷失（迷路）与反叛（迟到）作为开场，特写跟拍配合不间断的音乐，全程营造一种紧张、焦虑与压抑的氛围，如同经历了一场梦魇，这是非常聪明的传记片拍法，不讲流水账式的传奇故事，而以点带面将焦点放在一个挣扎求生的女性身上。影片正如片名所示，剥去被神化的戴安娜的躯壳，去还原一个作为人的斯宾塞，从这个角度来说，表演是影片成败的关键，从出道就充满争议备受媒体关注的小K显然做到了，那种被围困格格不入的状态，很难说是她在演斯宾塞还是在诠释自己的内心状态。
戴安娜本人也希望如同小k一样活出自我吧，哎。笼中雀谁不向往自由呢？
作为人物传记片，各方面都非常不错。戴安娜从高耸城堡走入平凡的街头，是从内心极度纠结到外在逐渐释放的一个过程，渴望自由，渴望平凡，渴望寻常人的苦乐，由此来说电影节奏是非常不错的，专注于斯图尔特惴惴不安的神情，紧张的踱步，以及含泪颤抖的诉说。敏感、孤独、压抑到神经质的戴安娜形象不是经过情节来展现，全部靠表演。但同时和历史影像相比，不知有意识还是无意思的表演多了一层追求“美”，带点矫饰，少了戴安娜本人的气质。影像也值得学习，有轻有重，有薄有厚，生活化场景的平面处理，戏剧化场景的影调处理，以及恰到好处的捕捉。
“笼中鸟”的概念执行得不错。从某种程度上来说，戴安娜也是王室养的“野鸡”，为了给民众编织谎言，打造童话。王妃必须要有，但并非不可替代。
这色调老让我觉得在看韦斯·安德森，至于内容，Crown珠玉在前。
戴安娜的全名叫Diana Spencer，结合电影的片名以及结尾的对白可以看出，比起亦步亦趋的王妃，她更喜欢自由自在的平民，比起世人皆知的戴安娜，她更愿意做无人知晓的斯宾塞。
不蹭旧名气，是对创作的自信，是勇气也是挑战。演员没有套牢在任何一个角色的设定，剧情更是不落窠臼，今年高产，质量均上乘，未来可期，真的祝福并期待毛骗系列及其他作品。
烛光下的女王是未来，将来的我在皇冠下指摘苛责。
不得不说的是，与以往我见过的戴妃形象相比，比如美剧《王冠》，甚至是戴安娜本人出镜的纪录片，斯图尔特这一版的戴妃实在是太美艳了，而且不管和真实情况的吻合度有所少，她的桀骜不驯、顾影自怜都让人印象深刻。特别是影片中两次扯断珠链，既表明了挣脱王室华丽桎梏的抗争，也暗示了难以摆脱红颜薄命厄运的结局。
说到底，叛离皇室与重返家族压根是两回事，把戴安娜不幸的出口寄托于父亲、祖宅、旧时光、中产生活、肯德基，未免是创作者太一厢情愿的粗陋勾连，一种庸俗的心理主义对主人公简化。全片俗不可耐且无话可说尴尬尤其体现在对Anna Boleyn的空洞召唤上。从《第一夫人》降级到《斯宾塞》，剩下的只是一套静态的肖像美学，真正的叙事和人物动作已被精致姿势所瓦解。
一个模仿戴妃的人露出美国人Kristen Stewart的本来面目。
看过《王冠》第四季，再看这部电影版，感受完全不一样。电影非常压抑，小K饰演的戴安娜不只是敏感神经质，还有幻想，偏执狂。小表情小细节非常非常多，可惜的是，三天里的戴安娜，很难让人产生共情。非常可惜
这个大概就是典型的，表演情绪然后完全陷入情绪的那种电影，所有演员都没有什么特别亮眼的地方。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
