Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
这两年很流行这种类型的恐怖片，美轮美奂的风景镜头+迷幻的音乐+离奇夸张的符号隐喻，营造出一种梦境般的割裂。最后的连环生子还挺恶心的。远离男人，不然男人死也不会放过你的。
#22#45感情里要死要活死缠烂打的人实在可怕，第三胎时女主那嫌弃的眼神把我看爽了。
前半段画面太美，疯狂截图，后半段生娃简直让人李安附体“我看不懂但我大受震撼”
生殖这部分还是看懂了的…这个片子只有6.9分是有一部分人破防了吗？
一个男人 地脱身换骨多少遍才能得到女人的爱
所以看到最后“他们”为了分娩不断哀嚎，被开膛剖腹，然后死去，竟然有种莫名爽感？因为“他们”终于体验到了分娩之苦……不过这种东西只存在于大银幕，现实中的部分“他们”，依旧大言不惭，妄图控制“她们”的生与育来达成表面深明大义实则令人不齿的目的。
虽然是恐男片，但女主角人设如此单薄工具人……
能理解导演想要表达的东西，但内容实在太少，做成一个短片来讲述就差不多咯。一开始其实觉得挺吓人的，但越看越满头问号。我其实不太喜欢将女性所处的困境如此符号化地表达出来，这样反而会弱化问题的根本。而且最后怎么没有安排女主一斧头把丈夫鬼魂砍烂！哼哼~大失所望！btw导演是拍广告片出身的吗，一开始真以为点进了汽车广告哈哈哈哈。
抛却剧本/故事后的概念/设定先行 但也并非是影像化的 只是纯粹某种猎奇式的展现 将自然与男性嫁接在一起仍然在强调强和弱的二元对立 更是一种生态主义的滥用
[视]R血，露鸟，A24，导演<湮灭><机械姬>。氛围片，一人饰多角，后期有影史级重口桥段，雌雄同体，分叉手，套娃。个人第6666个已看条目
气质太独特了，画面和氛围也是真是好到想骂人，还创造了或许是今年最好的恐怖片段。
这不比咒吓人？？恐男大合集 最后一幕男人的自我循环孕育有被震到
嗯没看懂。电影里男人的意识和言语好恐怖，女性的社会处境，包括不限于窥视，裸露，秽语，家庭暴力…取景很美，自然和生育，非常多的奇怪意象。
想探讨女性社会问题很好，但这也描写的太激进了吧。就这么直接以复仇者般挥刀乱砍一气，倒是的确可以让极端的一类女权主义者兴奋起来，但作为电影作品也太直白了点吧。像是极端女权者以最恶毒嚣张的姿态喊了一句：“男人没一个好东西”观影过程就像一场歇斯底里的谩骂，没有起到任何正面的教育意义。用力过猛，矫枉过正，适得其反。希望女性话题的电影不要沦为资本赚钱的工具，而是真正认真严谨的探讨，敏锐的揭露，努力的共同寻找方法，毕竟这是一个严峻且严肃的社会问题。（但该夸的地方还是要夸：视觉效果还是很牛）
中间一度给我看笑了，主要是男人受伤或者死我都没法共情，干外科又看惯了这些血腥，最后那个套娃可能还真是男人想要的。闺蜜还是很太阳的，但是怀着孕我就突然想到这些傻缺男都是女人生的，这比这个片子让我难受多了。
一个不快乐的男人，就是一只专吸女人血的吸血鬼。
【3.5】A24出品的又一部恐怖片
6.5分。应该会是部评价二元分化的恐怖片。我全片想不明白的是女主到底想要咋样？其实神父说的也不是没道理，丈夫的确渣，但女主自己过不了自己这关又咋办呢？说白了更像是女主自己扭捏的心态导致看谁都一个脸，也引发了这一系列的事件。到最后这算是和自己和解了么？整个电影不恐怖，也不惊悚，略有那么一点点恶心。分叉手和套娃的设计还挺不错的~~~
女权文艺恐怖片。可惜目标观众不是三者的合集，得是交集。
中间一度给我看笑了，主要是男人受伤或者死我都没法共情，干外科又看惯了这些血腥，最后那个套娃可能还真是男人想要的。闺蜜还是很太阳的，但是怀着孕我就突然想到这些傻缺男都是女人生的，这比这个片子让我难受多了。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
