这是Richard Lester最好的一个片。
An absurdist classic
This is a wonderful surreal comedy based on the play by Spike Milligan and John Antrobus. You know that it is going to be an odd film right at the beginning, when the opening credits list the cast in order of their height. The film begins with the BBC (Frank Thornton) telling us through the facade of an old television that this is the third, or is it the fourth?, anniversary of the shortest war in history, lasting 2 hours and 28 minutes. England is now a barren landscape, littered with derelict cars and buildings, hills of old boots, broken crockery, and other debris. Forty million people perished and there are only 20 known survivors. The Queen did not survive, and of the 20 known survivors the next in line for the throne is a Mrs Ethel Schroake of 393a High Street, Leytonstone. Among the other survivors are Ralph Richardson (O Lucky Man!) as Lord Fortnum of Alamein, who isn't looking forward to his impending mutation into a bed sitting room. Michael Hordern is Bules Martin, who wears a 18-carat Hovis bread ring. Spike Milligan is a postman who wanders around and delivers some memorable dialogue, for example: "And in come the three bears - the daddy bear said, 'Who's been sleeping in my porridge?' - and the mummy bear said, 'that's no porridge, that was my wife' ". Arthur Lowe is slowly turning into a parrot (which is then eaten by Spike Milligan), while his wife, the owner of her own death certificate, turns into a wardrobe. His daughter is pregnant with a strange creature, which she has held inside her for seventeen months. Peter Cook and Dudley Moore are a pair of policemen who perpetually tell the others to "keep moving!". Moore growls a lot and turns into a dog at the end. Marty Feldman is a wellington-boot-wearing nurse. It's a hilarious, absurdist treat, and one of my treasured filmic pleasures.
聚焦於很小的切口上去展示這頗具顛覆性的設想，不置入太多的批判，只是讓兩個他去互相感知對方。男主內心的糾結與傷感，仿生人害怕被淘汰的恐慌，整個作品的命題，我們活著是為了他人還是自己？ 太棒了。
男主演得不错，但还是不太喜欢看他的脸。女主有点太完美，就好像夫妻生活中没有任何争吵。克隆体替你生存，帮你照顾家庭，或者克隆体，就是你。你死了，你的一部分还活着，所以你没有死。
/chy/与心爱的人在一起是难以面对死亡的
new product launch
也许我们惧怕的从来都不是死亡本身 而是怕当下所拥有的一切都变成虚无 怕再也不能够真实地和爱的人相拥 说不上是死者的自私还是善意的谎言 爱到底能不能因此而延续谁也不知道 但最起码此刻你看着我的眼睛说的“I love u”是真实存在
我挚爱的一切
像散文小品，隔靴搔痒。人物内心挖掘的深度其实还有些空间可以继续…
构图很apple，克隆所的风格好像《机械姬》里面那个林间house，想想这生意一条龙，跟用户说绝症治不了了建议克隆，克隆人送过去还让本尊留下临终关怀顺带套路下一个潜在用户，机智呀！另外，克隆体的创作设计这些抽象能力和本尊应该不完全一样吧？
科幻片要讨论伦理问题是很正常的，也可以说理所应当深入到人伦的深处去。但有一个前提，就是这事有可能发生，这个有可能构建于理性可以理解的范围。类似这种我嫉妒我的架构就难有说服力，无限接近但依然不接近才是正确的打开方式。
女主太TM丑，实在看不下去，看20分钟弃之，差评1星（其实男主还行，虽然都是黑的）
2. 是科幻（或者说科技）与人文的结合。
无法欣赏，搞这么多就是纠结要不要克隆重生？
把告别这件事掰开了揉碎了讲到了心坎儿里TT被遗忘是一件痛苦的事
拍的蛮美的，但是议题已经不新颖，思考也蜻蜓点水浮皮潦草的。
偏文艺，我与非我，什么决定了我之所以成为我，生命、感情延续与伦理冲突这些问题的探讨，没有太过深入，也没有太大触动。对于这类科幻片，我一向觉得利用科技移植或者复制意识，是非常恐怖的事情，因为能够毫无差别的复制人类意识，就能够做修改、进行操控，那样的时代场景，绝对不是人类盛世。
黑镜既视感。摄影，剪辑，光影，设计，都太对我胃口了。
即使把家人托付给另外一个“自己”，内心也会一定觉得肯定是哪里出错了的难以释怀。
这事儿搁我我也愿意，走了什么都没了，能让自己周边的亲人不因自己的早逝而难过，有什么不好呢
真挚的感情，需要凝滞的节奏来表现？没必要吧
科技改变道德标准，可控的宽容才应该得到歌颂
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
