Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
真的太无聊了，无聊到我看了好多次手机… 作为一个研究人员，徒手碰bloodborne samples是真得很拽哦？这是bsl2以上级别的东西了吧！我只记得女主好好看，她在poi里就好亮眼！以及keaton新预告真的是注定鸟人了… 咋说，真的就好无聊！本来就平淡无奇的剧情还这种水铺垫这种瞎转折。而且开头这一幕为什么从来就不解释？？？不愧是leto，以达拉斯和美国精神病人的不同身躯，演绎了dc最烂片和漫威最烂片…… 下次选片长点心吧！
关键你这本子也是80年代的啊
是因为吸血鬼曾经风靡一时，所以才有了这样的英雄吗？和秃鹰联动的彩蛋，所以就是他们这块是飞禽走虫组的？
反派没有合理铺垫，动作戏仓促结束，甚至我怀怀疑中间被剪了几个小时，整部片给我的感觉就是急吼吼
虽说是个漫威人物，但怎么看都像是低配版《暮光之城》，然后又磨磨唧唧，廉价特效，各种装。到底在演个虾米故事，完全看不懂。3
Wow, have never seen such a non-sensical movie for so long. The love interest does nothing whatsoever, and the good and evil duality seems arbitrary -- why is Milo evil when there was no character development backing it up? Way too many loopholes -- not sure why Matt Smith and Jared Harris get mixed up in this.
难看程度不亚于《暮光之城》，起码人家还能吸引一波恋爱脑粉。
还真的像网友所说，降低了期待值后发现的确没那么糟糕，剧情土的像多少年前的B级片，特效勉强能看，主角和反派的关系真有点像金刚狼兄弟俩当年，然后主角到底是蝙蝠侠还是德古拉伯爵？造型是真的丑，本来一帅哥最后只能在黑夜里活动了。当然最主要的是这是索尼蜘蛛侠宇宙的一部分，但目前两部毒液，一部暗夜博士，愣是不知道蜘蛛侠是哪个版本的，网友猜测托比虫的可能更大，然后托比和毒液大战险恶六人组，当然最后只能看索尼怎么在彩蛋中继续主线剧情了。女主挺好，变成了德古拉二代。漫威宇宙目前的剧情不明，而索尼宇宙还能扶上墙吗？
1
魔幻蝙蝠侠，科幻吸血鬼，莱托应该去演德古拉
(这算是……漫威蝙蝠侠？)
作为起源来说还成吧，类似于金刚狼起源电影的设定，情同手足的兄弟获得差不多的能力，但志向不同走到对立面。
黑夜传说+蝙蝠侠混血，还没混好，白瞎这么好的卡司了，本身背后的超凡蜘蛛侠也不是多么成功的作品，这还要强行碰瓷，正片都没拍明白研究彩蛋玩……
我以为的莱托少爷演吸血鬼：《夜访吸血鬼》中阿汤哥那样式的…
👍 还不错啊！画面赛博朋克，兄弟阋墙的剧情也表现的很好。豆瓣5.7分偏低了，比今年那个圣母婊蜘蛛侠好太多！（啊另外，求你们好好拍一部独立系列吧。别再搞宇宙联动了！！！）
行吧，漫威作为一个品牌，已经发展出自己的超能力了。超级催眠。
？？？不过最后与蝙蝠齐飞那一幕还是挺帅的，其他的地方感觉像两个智障撕逼...
？？？？？？？？这是什么没有个性的超级蝙蝠蜘蛛侠，我想看Matt Smith当主角倜傥吸血鬼
当暗夜博士窜上那么高的房顶时，范迪塞尔的小弟竟然能够赶得上，他是开的车上楼顶的吗？ 乏善可陈的电影里最惊艳的就是女主角，可惜戏份也并不多。最后……新“蝙蝠侠”偶遇旧蝙蝠侠，可是一个是有超能力的，一个是……新秃鹫……
【马特史密斯凹脸的时候有点像凯文贝肯】
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
