Fraught with over obvious symbolism, Hartley's early feature is nonetheless a joy to watch. Hal here shows us his uncanny ability to cast his characters perfectly came early in his career.
Adrienne Shelley is a near perfect foil to herself, equal parts annoying teen burgeoning in her sexuality (though using sex for several years); obsessed with doom and inspired by idealism gone wrong she is deceptively – and simultaneously – complex and simple. Her Audrey inspires so many levels of symbolism it is almost embarrassingly rich (e.g., her modeling career beginning with photos of her foot – culminating her doing nude (but unseen) work; Manhattan move; Europe trip; her stealing, then sleeping with the mechanics wrench, etc.)
As Josh, Robert Burke gives an absolutely masterful performance. A reformed prisoner/penitent he returns to his home town to face down past demons, accept his lot and begin a new life. Dressed in black, and repeatedly mistaken for a priest, he corrects everyone ("I'm a mechanic"), yet the symbolism is rich: he abstains from alcohol, he practices celibacy (is, in fact a virgin), and seemingly has taken on vows of poverty, and humility as well. The humility seems hardest to swallow seeming, at times, almost false, a pretense. Yet, as we learn more of Josh we see genuineness in his modesty, that his humility is indeed earnest and believable. What seems ironic is the character is fairly forthright in his simplicity, yet so richly drawn it becomes the viewer who wants to make him out as more than what he actually is. A fascinatingly written character, perfectly played.
The scene between Josh and Jane (a wonderful, young Edie Falco . . . "You need a woman not a girl") is hilarious . . . real. But Hartley can't leave it as such and his trick, having the actors repeat the dialogue over-and-over becomes frustratingly "arty" and annoying . . . until again it becomes hilarious. What a terrific sense of bizarre reality this lends the film (like kids in a perpetual "am not"/"are too" argument).
Hartley's weaves all of a small neighborhood's idiosyncrasies into a tapestry of seeming stereotypes but which delves far beneath the surface, the catalyst being that everyone believes they know what the "unbelievable truth" of the title is, yet no two people can agree (including our hero) on what exactly that truth is. A wonderful little movie with some big ideas.
态度是想反传统权力结构，但拍得太浅了，又想猎奇搞笑，就什么都没做好。演员也不出彩，徐贤的状态不是特别好，男主不认识。当然，还是要比五十度灰好点的。
真的有人会拒绝会下厨、工作认真、主动被抽的小奶狗吗（果然是少女漫改编hhh）
完全没有说服力的SM戏码，韩式契约俩人来包装性虐，就像纸包不住火。
意料之外的好看。上司不为人知的性癖好意外被名字相似的下属拆错快递时发现，不但没被揭穿，反而两人因“性趣”相投签署了一份秘密合约，最后假戏产生真情。导演在“欲”和“纯爱”之间火候拿捏得不错，给观众科普了一些ds的知识，也为某一部分人群平反，具有一定的社会意义。韩国又刷新了挑战敏感题材的类型，不错。
5/10。浮皮潦草，蜻蜓点水。岛国一些AV拍得都不知道好到哪里去了。
想看的都没看到 情愫一大堆的SM没有情欲只有女权还得了？高甜奶狗0.5罢了 全程唯一好奇的点是这个女的好眼熟 看完一搜原来是昨天还在甜美舞蹈今天挥斥方遒的少女时代
原来是女子力，勇于反抗男性凝视的故事，但包裹了一层SM的壳子。
3.5啦，贤宝取巧地借了SMDS这类引发关注的题材入局，且完成度很高，不把自己圈在甜甜的偶像剧里，有态度又美艳，进可攻退可守，少女时代的忙内，容许（红薯）夫妻，期待她有新的被大众熟知的标签
如果有sub的话，我可以为他做dom！
“the woman is 30 did you expect her to gee gee gee until 50”
后半段完全变成了浪漫爱情片，前面的教学拍的挺好，画面挺有想法，男女主颜值也很高，还是值得看看的
好新的题材，反正我之前是没接触过。蛮新颖的～带着好奇和激动的心情开始观影的，🇰🇷真有创意只能说，介于“能看”和“不能看”之间的成人化电影。不说啥深奥的社会意义和批判精神，就选角和演技都可以给到很高的分数。
这男人是真的狗啊，可爱的那种(*╹▽╹*)
犬系 yes，虐狗nono。。比预期带感，徐贤good job。
本以为会很香艳很刺激，但是除了少数几个镜头还有点意思之外，大多时候也太无聊太干巴巴了，看得人昏昏欲睡……
表面（项圈 踩踏 滴蜡 瘙痒 踩脸 皮带 羞辱 报备 皮裙 鞭打 手链 绳缚 疼痛）（幻想里有舔脚 结局有咬痕）内里（女：一见钟情 相互契约 界限逾越 冷静克制 /男：情感受挫 自卑恐爱 界限清晰 渴望挽留）剧情是常规的，“真空”理想状态下的都市男女恋爱，达到了轻松的任务（本来性只是壳，爱情喜剧罢了），也习惯性带了一笔“反面教材”（闺蜜老板娘的线下，也要靠女主闺蜜这个角色来点醒争吵冷战中的男女主，总之皆大欢喜，祝大家爱到相爱的人♥️
很好地了解了DS是什么。
神仙电影，韩国人太敢拍了，女导演yyds。男主狂戳我xp，谁不想要这样一只可爱帅气的狗狗呢！片子除了讨论小众xp的生存问题，还涉及现在的性别话题，对女性友好，感恩。这样的gb剧摩多摩多！！
看得我全程姨母笑 导演一直给特写 色气的不行 男女主演员都选的太好了 女主人和男狗狗 亚洲这样的题材真是少见
最好的结尾应该是女主命令男主跟她谈恋爱，男主欣然接受，结束。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
