Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
如果地狱就这样的话 那还挺可怕的（数学差的人就会进这样的地狱）
五星！ 继无名女尸和招魂2之后，近年最好的恐怖电影，解扣的几番稍有潦草，但绝对是小成本的惊喜之作。恐怖氛围把握的非常好，噱头也颇有设计，最后居然还有山羊现身。
前半部惊喜挺多的，数数的桥段设计非常有意思且惊悚，后半部略拉胯，你恶魔出来就出来吧，出来个这么个东西，长的这么萌，怎么让观众代入。。。牛魔王都比这个吊毛面目狰狞
2星半吧，故事比较老套，前一个小时剧情沉闷，最后那盒子里的怪物形象倒是比较怪异，最后结局什么意思，女主也钻进盒子里了吗？
不算恐怖，就是变态家庭兄弟绑架求租女子，喂给邪神的故事。最后女主黑化，并且成为了这间房子的主人了。
不好看啊，情节设定也很平，平平淡淡的从开头到结尾。怪物的造型还挺新奇的
营造了恐怖阴深了情景，想吓你的地方偏偏不出来东西，后面最吓人的时候出来了就是只小绵羊。可以可以
看了一个半小时，伟大的数学家为了救儿子把家装潢成开启链接地狱之门，通往地狱之门的是留声机，之前没成功是每次都打断了留声机数数，最后一次成功播放完房子和地狱之门互通，这个恶魔是我见过最善良的教你数数，数到300万02，这片子太无聊了，我不会忘记今年看的第一部无聊恐怖片
原来邻家女优都39岁了，最后上下楼梯的时候心提到了嗓子眼，可惜这结局也太膈应人了
可以消磨时间，剧情一般，亮点是加入了数学公式
看了一个半小时，伟大的数学家为了救儿子把家装潢成开启链接地狱之门，通往地狱之门的是留声机，之前没成功是每次都打断了留声机数数，最后一次成功播放完房子和地狱之门互通，这个恶魔是我见过最善良的教你数数，数到300万02，这片子太无聊了，我不会忘记今年看的第一部无聊恐怖片
前面气氛烘托挺好的，看到是利维坦还觉得有点新意呢，结果又是地狱恶魔啊……结尾还不错
看了太多烂片 这个真的算可以了 故事完整也没有太多不合理的地方 邪神形象不错
很没意思 冲着怪物看的 结果他镜头少的可怜 剧情像裹脚布 就..ummm 三星给怪物的造型 挺独特的 可惜是个烂片(没想到我还会有为怪物惋惜的时候)
给女主出主意以后可以当房东然后只租给男房客～这种死法真的挺好的，在最美的梦境中脑袋被一口咬掉，绝对无痛，媲美安乐死，死了还能变鬼一直待房里，无敌～
当鬼魂或者恶魔变成我们能够够到的实体，就感觉没有那么恐怖了！就因为未知，理解不了才觉得恐怖！电影打发时间看看还可以，不怎么恐怖
这个怪物不错，长的挺有点东西的，最后女主也要像两个老头一样了吗？
我觉得就是恶魔，神秘宗教，巫术召唤，公式就是打开地狱之门的咒语，五边形以及符号就是仪式。为啥都喜欢解读成网暴，家庭裂痕，精神崩溃呢。
自家地窖竟然是冥界入口，这房子买的，值了。就该在门口支张桌子收费。
有点意思，可惜没有展开，薛定谔和黄泉比良坂蛮让人眼前一亮！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
