Max is a real jerk. A long time ago, the successful lawyer had turned over all the routine duties of family life to his wife Nathalie.His comfort and leisure time were a far greater priority. Sell the roadster and buy an efficient family car? No way!But then, Max’s fast-paced life suddenly screeches to a halt when Nathalie is hospitalized for several weeks with a complicated fracture.Alone with their two children and the dog he hates, Max quickly reaches the boiling point.As if having to play father was not bad enough, he is shocked to the core when he discovers passionate love letters written to his wife and signed “From G. in love”. Feeling that his life is slipping out of control, Max’s first impulse is to find out who his rival is. Then it dawns on him – could the way he has treated his wife be the reason why she has sought out another lover?Now Max attempts to see his situation from a different point of view. Last week he was ready to plan the yearly guys’ vacation he takes with his best buddy, but now things have changed.Max recognizes just how much he needs Nathalie’s humor, her organizing talent and her optimism, but also just how important to him she and his family really are. Max tries to discover the mysterious lover’s identity, but because of his new insight, he takes an additional step.Unfortunately, when he learns that the mystery man is Gregor, Max realizes that not only does the man have all those qualities - he is very attractive as well. His struggle to become a better husband and father suddenly becomes far more difficult.Hoping to knock Gregor out of the picture and get back in Nathalie’s good graces, Max makes an appointment with a successful life coach. But turning his life around is far more difficult than he had imagined.To make matters worse, Gregor turns out to be a loving, family-oriented man just what Nathalie needs. Max is desperate – he knows there is a real chance that he might lose Nathalie and the children.Willing to put everything on the line to keep his family intact, Max makes the biggest sacrifice of his life. Then something happens that is the very last thing he could have ever counted on…
符号不会比人更生动，角色也未必就比现实中的人更鲜活。第一点是意识问题，第二点依旧关乎意识但更多则是技术问题。这部第一点做的还可以，第二点就离生动鲜活相去甚远了。
服化道确实不错 小k演得过于用力 整体流于表面形式 对个人的展现非常单薄
我向宇宙之主祈祷这是关于黛安娜的最后一部电影了，真的够了，一定要拍皇室故事，拍拍安妮公主，拍拍玛格丽特公主，拍拍女王的婆婆爱丽丝公主，那么多精彩的故事可拍嗝这儿翻来覆去的嚼隔夜饭，而且做得还不好吃，我为什么要浪费时间看香奈儿给代言人拍的两个小时中古展示
天呐戴安娜王妃 居然是小k，这转型好美快认不出来
4.平淡，不够有力的矛盾冲突
当然，我尽可不感伤，毕竟那离我太远太远，我还远未到不喜欢华服美食的地步。
戴安娜本人有太多影像资料存世，尤其前几年还放出来一些更私人的自述，对于像不像这件事，个人其实不是很在意，就当一种阐述看就行。可是KS的演技尽力是尽力了，被人质疑“矫揉造作”也能理解批评的点。不过这个毫无共情点的剧本，我也想不出有几个演员才撑得起来。
难受，完完全全是戴妃视角，但这真的是戴妃的处境吗？感觉像是在地狱中，看着有些窒息感……2星半给服饰还原
知晓导演想表达什么，压抑解放blablabla，但看完只觉得无病呻吟，配乐也不喜欢。ks个人特色（长相姿态）太明显演传记片差了点。
就很绝，镜头非常棒。镜头语言加上小k的表演，真的能感到黛安娜的孤独与怀念，真的看哭了
封建社会真的擅长吃人，especially in吃女人。令人惊讶的是评论区里对戴妃和女演员的情绪要求，你们这样也是在要求她做你们想要的那个人，这样和the👑有什么区别我看不出来。
主题先行，倾向明显，影响电影深度发展。太平时代个性追求优先还是居安思危责任第一？两种价值观的冲突并不能以自由的王妃冲破保守的王室的简单评判分出是非曲直的，也应仔细倾听电影中女王与那个侍从官员的立场么。
就格局小，就逮着三天拍，就放着皇家舒芙蕾不吃闹别扭，怎么着了，就爱看这种“切片标本”式的电影。2022年了，还闹着看跨度一二十年的大弧光史诗感电影？太1.0了吧，就问，土不土啊，腻不腻啊？
小kk演得不错，将戴妃的脆弱、压抑、渴望自由的挣扎表现地很到位，全片基调沉郁，结尾的逃逸才显得弥足珍贵，给了戴妃也给了观众一息爽朗的自由空气。小k神颜依旧，Chanel服装超美，安吉表白时戴妃难掩的惊喜神情蛮出戏的，二人变身小k本人和苏，嘤嘤嘤
传统是让一种行为得到自然化的意识形态与权利，就像入住前的称重仪式，就像每一套迎合不同场合的服饰，它是某种具有宗教仪式感的教条化的行为，而这种教条化的行为与不得不伪装并归顺的自身也构成了其压抑与焦虑之所，另外这种对教条与伪装的固守也并非王室独有，在社会中它是一种普泛化的运行机制与规训系统，遵守纪律，学会以多张的面孔包装自己，而不是根据自己的情绪选择服饰，这就像戴妃的孩子们最后都必须经历的杀生，这一阉割的成人礼。
导演拉雷恩摒弃那些历史的细节，而从人物心理状态入手，着重展现英国王室繁杂的规矩章程对戴安娜脆弱身体与心灵的摧残
Spencer是心理惊悚片加安全驾驶宣传片……摄影打光挺好，音乐也有亮点，表演并非不好但太卖力而且完全没有说服力，从小切口拍传记是聪明合理的，但这个切口选得不够合理，全片下来人物没有任何弧光，味同嚼蜡，甚至让人怀疑导演的用意是嘲讽还是共情。这个电影里呈现的戴妃的痛苦，仿佛是为了KS的表演而存在的（不是说演得好的意思），而不能让人感受到这痛苦着的是一个真实的人，特别是最后的落点是她和两个儿子在泰晤士河边吃炸鸡，这就是她所求吗？太狭隘了。更进一步说，电影完全没有在史观和窥私当中取得平衡。拉拉因在拍智利说不和追捕聂鲁达的时候，和后来拍Jackie和Spencer简直判若两人。
the use of jazz is absolutely brilliant
一开始总觉得在看王冠的加长版，但电影的视角集中在黛安娜一人身上，其他所有皇亲贵胄都像是腐朽的阴影，他们企图将黛安娜也拉进这个坟墓，而她却从亡魂中获得了救赎，从咽下珍珠到扯碎项链，从穿上节日标签到换上父亲的夹克，她选择站在枪口前，选择站在残酷和冰冷对面。克莉丝汀的演技仿佛被黛安娜的灵魂附身，再加上影片里安妮博林从历史中穿越而来的灵魂，她们鬼魅的身影似乎可以打破一切，包括你面前的屏幕，于是只是想说，don’t go gentle into the night
她真的每一套衣服都好美。她学不会两幅面孔，深陷在痛苦矛盾中，而罪魁祸首的王室只是冷眼看着，还嫌她不本分。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
