A most pleasingly atmospheric rendition of the tale, noirishly photographed and moodily set, this is the version which probably would have delighted Conan Doyle the most. There is one important plot change which enables the beautiful Alice Brandt to enjoy both a larger role and a more intriguing part in the proceedings. This change also builds up the parts of Dr Mortimer and Lord Charles, yet at the same time provides a nice introduction to the is-he-sinister or is-he-a-good-guy Barrymore, deftly played here by Fritz Rasp.
Despite the sting of its well-developed story, the spellbindingly atmospheric direction and the engrossing performances delivered by the entire cast, many fans may find this version somewhat disappointing. For at least three reasons: As in the novel, the part played in the narrative by Sherlock Holmes, though vital, is minimal. And in this version, not only has no attempt been made to enlarge his role, if anything both writer and director do their best to minimize it. Holmes does not even make his entrance for half-an-hour, and when he does finally appear, he has his back to the camera. It is Fritz Odemar, as Dr Watson, who receives the more favorable camera angles. And there is a purpose in this. It is Watson, not Holmes, who figures as the main protagonist of The Hound of the Baskervilles. For the bulk of the narrative, Holmes disappears. It is Watson and Lord Henry (Peter Voss) who take up the running. The movie is almost over, before Holmes closes in on the villain. And even so, this is not the obsessed, self-important Holmes we are accustomed to see taking charge. Another problem is that the title hound itself does not figure a great deal in the action, a downgrading which will undoubtedly rate as another major disappointment for fans. And finally, it could be argued that the script gives too much attention to Conan Doyle's red herring, the escaped convict, and not enough to the real villain.
This said, it must surely be admitted by all, that Odemar's interpretation of Watson—intelligent, charming, level-headed, courageous and resourceful—is much closer to Conan Doyle's conception than either the bungling, inveterately stupid Nigel Bruce or the self-effacing Ian Fleming.
One other player deserves special mention: Erich Ponto (Dr Winkel in The Third Man) who seems exactly right for Stapleton. A difficult part, superbly played.
- JohnHowardReid, imdb
如果出单元剧集一定很有趣！
立意很好，但是剧情过于薄弱，怪物被一点笛声和一只箭就搞死了🤔
整部电影没有什么波动的情绪，连打怪的情节都是平铺直叙的简单。
最后大摇大摆走进人家正在开班会的教室众目睽睽之下对她说要跟你再睡一次的操作震惊我全家
开1.5倍速都嫌慢的程度…剧情挺无语的…本质上还是拍成了两女争一男的傻瓜疼痛青春片。虽然两个女生亲了做了，但真的莫名其妙…能不能少拍点这种玩意儿…唯一的优点是女主是适合演百合的脸
画风很美，很治愈。剧情一般，印象深刻的台词是，生活就要像这样尽自己所能，我们都别无选择。
青春就是敢爱敢追啊，从那么高的楼往下跳太狠了。
有点过于中二了hhhhh 但看到最后一句台词的时候还是忍不住“噗”的一声笑了出来
只有温柔如美雪，才能包容自私又迷人的女主。现实生活中，救赎总是极小概率事件，因为电影只有两小时，而生活却有一辈子。
2星给前半部分吧。腹黑女和小绵羊的设定我真的很吃，本来以为剧情是女主为了了解喜欢的男生，去接近小绵羊结果发现自己爱的是女生，对女生更感兴趣，然后2个女生人互相吸引在一起这样的性向启发题材。结果后半部分，腹黑女都和小绵羊亲了，睡了，竟然还能因为被男生拒绝而做出不好好学习，突然从教室跑掉这样极度颓废的事。小绵羊也是，你都和女生毫无心理障碍的亲也信了，睡了睡了，竟然还能说出要和男生去东京这样的话。看到男生因为父亲在家发疯，给女生打电话，还要女生护着的时候，我真的无语到了，他爸虽然不好但说的话挺对的，到最后5分钟的时候，2个女生都还围着阴郁的男生转，结尾却突然给我说，腹黑女还要通过和小绵羊再睡一次确定自己的心意，我真的谢谢你了导演，你这是恶心谁呢？？只有肉体关系没有感情算啥百合片？？？？
女主真是病态得让人喜欢啊，女二也是自怜得让人欢喜。作为催化剂和链接点的男主戏份恰到好处，不多不少。少女的无畏和少男的天真真是太有趣了。
画风非常喜欢，故事也简单，迷途之家是那些在灾难中失去家园的最后希望。不过后半段除妖比较突兀。
做得还不错？虽然人物设定简单，剧情冲突简单，就是一个普普通通的小故事。迷家的设定戳中我了，但是这个故事主线根本不需要迷家……这可能是让故事如此单薄的原因吧？在不需要的副线上开枝散叶大卖画面和设定，结果并没有起到丰富整体剧情的目的。就是一个宁静的童话。（嘛，用了一些有意思的神话元素还行，河童可爱诶）
重新定义家族的意义。悲伤失望的情绪会相互感染，化身一种无穷的力量压迫。背负这些但仍对未来充满希望和信心，这样迷途之人也能找到回家的路。
与其说是一个灵异故事不如说是一个童话故事，很可爱的童话故事
虽然我很期待疯批女主，但看完之后似乎没有想象中的精彩，感觉好像讲了点什么，又感觉好像什么都没讲。
好慢，像后青春期的诗。“即使只有一瞬间也好，你有向我敞开心扉的话，我就不会忘记那个瞬间。 ”
风景好美，每日一感慨，海滨城市太美了吧；讲故事就….
「打開吧 好無聊啊 打開吧 打開更多吧」女同×雙×直男，看吧，沒有哪個身份更好。看來我還是害怕真瘋批……晚上和女孩子討論，說其實文青並不是個好詞。
最近真的是迷上了这种治愈系的电影，还是很温暖的！
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
