Moving to Portland, Oregon and finding work in food service is easy for Paul and Ramona. A struggling musician without bandmates, Paul becomes introverted and moody. Ramona's friend from college introduces her to a new social circle and she goes out while Paul stays home. When Ramona confronts turning thirty, it's time to grow beyond old routines and her relationship with Paul comes to a head.
Paul and Ramona, a young couple in need of a change, move to Portland, Oregon from their hometown of Boise. Upon arriving, they sublet an apartment and begin to familiarize themselves with the city. While finding work is easy (Ramona begins waitressing, while Paul gets a job at a coffee shop), change is difficult. Their life in this new city seems to be on repeat. When their car breaks down and a tandem bicycle becomes their primary means of transportation, Ramona refuses to ride.
A struggling musician, Paul, spends most of his time at home, steadily becoming introverted and moody, while Ramona, at the insistence of a co-worker, is thrust into a new social circle, where she begins an affair with a co-worker. Ramona and Paul’s relationship implodes after she confesses and in the ensuing conflict, she impulsively leaves to stay with a friend. Paul, desperate to work through the pain of the split, befriends a quirky barista named Ali. This friendship gives him a chance to begin to heal and inspires him to focus on expression through his music.
连续看了几部“高分推荐”的印度神片，发现都是套路。其中之一就是一定要反转，尤其喜欢结尾反转，而且还要反转再反转。#疲乏#。另外这片电影长度如果能缩减到90或者120分钟会更好。电影过长，要批判的内容又那么多，观众没这么多#耐心#。
印度的电影，缺啥拍啥，这是最大的民主表现。
饱含冲击力的电影，看的时候就一直在想 “这里需要多少钱多少人？” “剪辑是怎么构思的？”
正义虽迟但到。不得不说，这电影挺牛的，既直白地揭露了某些社会不公的现象和讽刺了某些政客为了上位不择手段，又做到了多重反转。看到最后还挺解气的。
创作者的技法显然都撑不起表达欲，
停在律政片最佳 多了些政治批判也还好 但最后还是免不了印度式复仇的套路的俗
印度电影这是有逐渐韩国化的趋势啊~ 如果单看前半部分可能就是个俗套的正义执行，但后半段先从程序正义角度出发，进而引发出背后的真相，期间还讨论了媒体、学校、社会在其中扮演的角色，而且金句迭出，让人看得是目不暇接~「The greatest weapon of a politician is emotions. It is madness! Their thoughts, intelligence, and decisions are toppled over by this madness! Once they are affected by that madness, they won't be just party workers. They will become devotees!」
非我等动动笔杆、喊喊口号的“理论家”所能企及
6.一个国家的尊严就是它给予女性的尊严
四星全给题材 如果不是题材 真的没办法给一部2个多小时的MV这么多星……
媒体在争相报道，电视台在讨论，一个关于女性的案子引发了全国的关注，最后水落石出，真相大白。
“你们坐的椅子是有历史的，不是坐在上面的那些人的历史，而是站起来的那些人的历史。”年轻人们，站起来吧。反转过于频繁，情节密得过分，就很刻意，失去真实和震撼感。瑕不掩瑜，主题还是高分。
反转太多其实有点毁我的观感，但是律师掷地有声地喊话还是蛮让人感动，尤其是唐山事发后不久看这个片。“一个国家的尊严等于它给女性的尊严”
一口气杂糅一堆社会现实，强行反转，印度演员表演上都用力过度
所以，这部阿三片看了十分钟，我以为又是探讨强奸问题的（毕竟，这已经是阿三们挥之不去的顽疾了）。看了一个小时，我以为是警察化身法外裁决者的爽片。但是，怎么可能？这部片子长达161分钟，一个小时过后，当我们以为了解了事情的来龙去脉的时候，后半段进入了精彩的法庭辩论，真相层层剥开，反转再反转，激荡人心的配乐，看得人心潮澎湃。短短161分钟的电影，涉及到了强奸、校园腐败、种姓制度、政治黑暗、媒体导向，也深刻的反省了法学理论中很重要的一个议题:实体正义和程序正义哪一个更重要？
印度在题材上的大胆和韩国电影不相上下。真是让我们望尘莫及。
不断反转之中，逻辑也合情合理。但是信奉甘地这个点我很不喜欢，非暴力不合作，本身就是”假革命“啊~
2021有《杰伊·比姆》，2022有《宿敌》。两部针砭时弊的印度电影都极度震撼了我。我曾在其他影评中有这样一种观点，好电影能让人从犯困看到不困，差电影可以让人从不困看到犯困
5.最脏最黑的永远是政治家，最根源的腐败是种姓制度
同样是发展国家，同样问题重重的印度给出了答案。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
