Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
谢苗近几年电影质量挺可以的啊，动作和演技还真有那股劲！离开网大到院线估计会大火！
剧情过于简单，打戏值三星。谢苗可以啊，希望可以火。
有点扯，做犯法的事还敢众人面前这么嚣张，背后又抓人家把柄，那不如直接抓把柄非要搞前面那一出还让当jc的姑爷和他爹知道这么个事。一帮人有枪还整不了一个jc.纯属扯淡。故事人物演的还行，就是不切实际。
动作太假了，每到打斗的情节，摄像机的镜头就一直在切换。
卧槽！这片子可以啊！节奏快，剧本没啥槽点，还有升华，打斗精彩，演技也都写实，卧槽，真不错。
国产小成本电影算不错的啦！特别是打斗场面可以啊，男警察也太能打了。
with mary
故事简单，但是拍的质量挺不错的，节奏挺快，看得挺开心
值得四星鼓励，魏君子老师辛苦能让大家看到国产动作片的新进步，医院和大巴的打斗可见预算不充裕，但是谢苗卖力演出还是值得一看，看到谢苗长大当警察也感叹我们即将步入中年，喜欢的事业就值得继续干下去，期待第二部能上大荧幕一定支持
剧情一般，个人主义太强了吧，实在不喜欢这种设定啊。但打斗戏我好爱看，太爽了，小谢多来点现代动作片吧。
2015-2022唯一能拿得出手的网大（吊威亚戏除外哈
谢苗演技很不错很代入，剧情很弱，打戏网大里算top级别了。
很不错，没有把观众当傻逼的电影就是好电影，谢苗很好👍
三星半，剧情简单直接，重点是打戏是真来啊，跟一般的花拳绣腿绣花观感真的不一样，然后警察一点不圣母，下手凶狠程度一度让我怀疑能不能过审啊，看着还是挺爽的，一些逻辑小bug，谢苗一警察有点流里流气的，肖家三兄弟怎么就这么容易弄出个地下大赌场，还过完假期就收手不干了，规模不大手枪喷子都装备上了，也没那么重要了
桃子这广告味道的台词
第一次看谢苗的网大，还不错，长得也挺硬汉，打戏很过瘾！
谢苗打戏还挺好，但我就一边看一边想下了那么多动画片，这种级别的打戏的电影为啥还能上啊？这不算宣传暴力么？另外就是我为啥觉得谢苗长得有点像吴刚。。。
谢苗怎么把自己搞得这么瘦了，脸都凹进去了，打戏还是不错的，演技也是可以的，剧情马马虎虎。
能看出来，谢苗很努力的想演好，事实证明，演的也确实不错，除了有点耍帅，其他方面都合格。
剧情和动作设计都一般般，毕竟是网大，还凑合
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
