Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
魅力来自于有性格的反派，打的很爽，如果能来更多脑力的对决更好
反派不太行，如果第一部反派从能力到气场都是那种黑帮大佬，这部顶多算是有点狠的小流氓。
马东锡真的可正可邪，任何人在他面前都只是喽啰。任何人！
我这一巴掌下去你可能会死，动作戏纯粹干净利落
剧情上没第一部精彩，反派也没第一部有气场，但好笑程度上一个台阶。打戏厉害。
电影节奏非常好，对马东锡无感，但是男二太有魅力，一双细长的眼睛看谁都像在看死人，不知道韩国什么时候冒出个这么好的演员。故事普通，值三星，为了男二加一星。推荐观看。
有一种具先生在鸭子店混不下去了变身绑架犯的感觉
混战场面的动作戏设计的太刻意了~刀在手上就是不用
以暴制暴的警匪题材，拳拳到肉，印象中是难得正面形容韩国警方也是能打的电影。
这不比现在的漫威爽得多？拳拳到肉的快感，马东锡的大逼斗呼人真是怎么都看不腻。
张夷帅张社长从良以后好好笑啊哈哈哈哈，每次被捏的时候，旁边都有小弟在负责吃面。跟第一部比起来，质量真的差好多。反派的设定、剧情走向、打戏安排上都不行。当然，马东锡依旧帅。
孙锡久太hot了，但角色不立体，远没有赵泰晤的形象丰满。可惜了。
反派严重智商不足又打不过警察。那股子狠劲也是外强中干。
“我开你的USB过去就行。”“大哥，那叫SUV。”
依旧是马大叔的暴力执法，梗还是老梗但感觉比1好看呢～
最后公交车一战就值4星，拳拳到肉，真是爽翻….荐！
不值五星，但因为好过第一部，还因为帅死人的姜海尚和笑死人的张易秀加半颗星。
非常套路又非常欢乐，而且为什么结尾大战之前又出现那种神台词，“这钱咱们五五分吧！ 那谁拿五啊？”真是笑死了，哈哈哈哈，下一部是不是要给马叔认真找个对象啥的了，期待第三部。
一家都挂你电话HH 在越南一屋子人候着 都能硬战，到韩国才来3个警察 就吓跑了？韩国车道掉头这么容易？反派干了这么多票还这么穷逼叨叨的样子也是挺创业失败的啊。看马东锡过肩摔轻松地感觉自己也可以了 HH 为什么会觉得反派帅？get不到啊这么凶残的人。“我们五五分。谁拿五。……”HH 做警察真得练好技能不然分分钟出事啊
能用刀絕不用槍，原生態力量型打法很炸裂，馬東錫的短板是不會踢腿，反派演出了人狠話不多，最佳段落反而是他的旅館2對N長鏡頭。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
