A witty, exhilarating and mind-expanding exploration of the word of our times - data - with mathematician Dr Hannah Fry. Following in the footsteps of BBC Four's previous gleefully nerdy, award-winning maths films The Joy of Stats, Tails you Win - The Science of Chance and The Joy of Logic, this new high-tech romp reveals exactly what data is and how it is captured, stored, shared and made sense of. Fry also tells the story of the engineers of the data age, people most of us have never heard of despite the fact they brought about a technological and philosophical revolution.
For Hannah Fry, the joy of data is all about spotting patterns. She's Lecturer in the Mathematics of Cities at UCL as well as being the presenter of the BBC series Trainspotting Live and City in the Sky, and she sees data as the essential bridge between two universes - the tangible, noisy, messy world that we see and experience, and the clean, ordered, elegant world of maths, where everything can be captured beautifully with equations.
Along the way the film reveals the connection between Scrabble scores and online movie streaming, explains why a herd of Wiltshire dairy cows are wearing pedometers, and uncovers the remarkable network map of Wikipedia. What's the mystery link between 'marmalade' and 'One Direction'?
The Joy of Data also hails the giant contribution of Claude Shannon, the American mathematician and electrical engineer who, in an attempt to solve the problem of noisy telephone lines, devised a way to digitise all information. It was Shannon, father of the 'bit', who singlehandedly launched the 'information age'. Meanwhile, the green lawns of Britain's National Physical Laboratory host a race between its young apprentices in order to demonstrate how and why data moves quickly and successfully around modern data networks. It's all thanks to the brilliant technique first invented there in the 1960s by Welshman Donald Davies - packet switching - without which there would be no internet as we know it.
But what of the future, big data and artificial intelligence? Should we be worried by the pace of change, and what our own data could and should be used for? Ultimately, Fry concludes, data has empowered all of us. We must have machines at our side if we're to find patterns in the modern-day data deluge. But, Fry believes, regardless of AI and machine learning, it will always take us to find the meaning in them.
2.5；美国变态真他妈多。。很平庸的片子 最后草蛇灰线前后细节联系的还挺好 给个3星吧 不能再多！伊桑霍克是欠钱了吗要演这种角色 这大肚腩。。哭了
本来期待是悬疑惊悚片，没想到温馨的一塌糊涂。怀疑对人贩子有洗白的嫌疑。
电影中很多处处理都极其生硬和套路，让男孩去记名字最后治好失语那一段，几处飞机和学校来回切也让人不适，以及最后母亲的奔跑长镜头也很套路。
贫富差距不是原罪，而是欲望。一味的投降换不回来和平，盈亏之间，亏的一方无论如何退让，只会加剧另一方的野心。抗争和好战，永远是两回事。
宋康昊的很多电影要比这个更值得拿奖吧？不知道评委们怎么想的。
是枝裕和江郎才尽了吗？不就是再拍了部韩版的《小偷家族》？还是低配的。刻意温情的痕迹很重，以往的批判力度消失无踪，关于堕胎的迷惑发言让我震惊。是枝裕和你快眨眨眼，这其实不是你拍的对不对？
过分地平庸，小男主简直就像玩游戏看残影一般通关，伊桑霍克这个反派充满了弱鸡蠢感，故事平淡，牺牲的小朋友太令人难过了，难受，开挂的小妹倒是演技蛮好，可爱。里面太多废的细节，自杀的母亲，凶手的过去，父亲的狂躁都没有讲清楚。
两场谋杀案的设置挺好
战争是可怕的，尤其战争波及到儿童，他们又能懂得了什么呢？但是因为战争死亡的儿童太多了，和平永远需要维持。
这一个多月以来才意识到我们生在和平岁月这代人对战争态度的傲慢和天真。不明白点对点精准打击只是个看上去很美包装后的概念，没见过枪炮，没见过尸体，没见过死亡，没见过应激创伤，没见过销烟后的残垣断壁。可以不了解，但至少别丧失敬畏
后半部分让人心碎，演员都很美。总觉得可以更好
4.0，细节节奏台词演员如此完美，摄影写实的应该是没有打灯（现实主义应该有的样子，不美化不矫揉造作），我喜欢，就是结尾实在太完美了，是是枝裕和年老了嘛？对人性有的善意了吗？“是枝裕和近年来愈发心慈手软了，敛锋藏芒的他甚至连一根芒刺都不愿轻易施诸于故事与人物之上。”
本来期待是悬疑惊悚片，没想到温馨的一塌糊涂。怀疑对人贩子有洗白的嫌疑。
灵异与恐怖的结合之作，整体节奏不算太好，Finn最后在众亡灵的协助下完成反杀很帅，但真的不算是R级恐怖片，更偏向灵异一些。
一个多小时了才进入正题 节奏太慢了 又一个残酷战争中的代表事件 覆巢之下 焉有完卵 人类的自相残杀什么时候能够休止 上帝啊 你别再捡铅笔了
和平和活着最重要。
开头就暗示了大英皇家空军是瞎子。上帝是不是在捡铅笔，真的是戳心。
真实改编，愿战争不在出现！年轻的特蕾莎修女！
5分。其实核心还是要勇敢，既有校园暴力，又有家庭暴力，总是要站出来。不过剧情逻辑太随意了。犯罪背景又加了一堆通灵，太奇怪了。小女孩演得很好。
战争对于生命就是这么荒诞，美化战争就是犯罪。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
