剧情介绍

  Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
  The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
  From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.

评论:

  • 玥雨 8小时前 :

    加菲铁定至少拿个奥斯卡最佳男主提名吧,表现真的好棒。林聚聚第一次做导演还挺不错,在舞台和银幕之间掌握了平衡,这真的挺不容易的。

  • 潍谛 2小时前 :

    林-曼努尔·米兰达《倒数时刻》2021

  • 祁轶 1小时前 :

    但几首歌曲外加加菲的表演实在是太好听太好看了!!希望加菲能够拿到影帝,胜在讨喜。

  • 蕾楠 8小时前 :

    有点难代入,Jon本身的经历比较令人唏嘘。

  • 雨初 4小时前 :

    “你是被恐惧牵着走,还是被爱引导着。”或许也是到了成年人的疲惫焦虑期,这句话让我感触颇深。阅读他人的人生,共鸣彼此的勇气。

  • 莲桐 5小时前 :

    那种焦虑紧迫感,将自己逼死,I am running out of time. 我没有时间了,我根本没有时间聊天建立亲密关系。

  • 鸿辰 0小时前 :

    前面的剪辑一度难进入,后面渐入佳境,最喜欢的几幕是泳池的音谱和天台的想象。好像一只蜡烛啊,尽管短暂但拼命燃烧,发光发热。如果这样活过的话,也足够精彩了吧。

  • 馨昕 9小时前 :

    剥开音乐剧的壳,内核就是个三十岁焦虑的故事,不是粉丝,没有共鸣。

  • 饶姝丽 8小时前 :

    乔纳森真是英年早逝,他的困境是时间,他的好朋友都在最好的年华相继去世,谁也不想在30岁还一事无成吧。可惜好歌不多,我最喜欢的一首是和朋友一起清唱的《波西米亚》。

  • 班睿博 3小时前 :

    不给加菲一个影帝提名说不过去,唱演俱佳,已经收藏OST。里面有一段关于创作者的话我边看边抄了下来,观看过程中两度落泪。看到瓦妮莎哈金斯再次演音乐剧电影又是另一番感受,她在网飞拍的其他烂片我都原谅了。

  • 鑫雪 2小时前 :

    为什么,为什么,为什么我们总是没有时间了,为什么一切永远都做不完,为什么我不能永远做个小孩子

  • 良涛 5小时前 :

    #22.03.23-24##SYJBL#是关于“我”的故事。好音乐,退出“观看中的剧场aura”以后并不觉得是一个很好的故事。所有的一切还是在于自我表达。所有人的表演都很棒,尤其是加菲。更像是一部行业宣传片,一部很creative的marketing。

  • 钟寒梦 1小时前 :

    对加菲刮目相看,他竟然把JL演活了,让我看到一个苦苦挣扎的天才的喜怒哀乐。Larson到死都没有看到自己的大作搬上百老汇的舞台,但是他的Rent改写了百老汇音乐剧的历史,也是当年我大学时期一群志同道合好友的精神激励。Lin-Manuel复原了当年Larson表演Tick Tick Boom的场景,表演与现实交织,以一种现代音乐剧电影不浮夸的风格将大时代与小人生的冲撞表现得不动声色。我不是一个会被情怀拐骗的观众,这绝对是一部可以成为经典的音乐剧电影。

  • 美钰 9小时前 :

    音符此起彼伏还有快速变更的画面非常流畅,三层结构的创作形式不停地输出一首又一首歌曲反而让剧作失去了节奏,真的真的会让人感到审美疲劳,尽管加菲的表演真诚热烈,但这个故事并不打动人心,即使叙事的材料有九十年代初的伤痛——酷儿苦难和艾滋病,有天才艺术家亘古不变的贫穷与现实辩题,有普通人和天才的选择分歧,最终导演给观众提炼出来的122min还是一个俗套的作品,感觉热情似火却毫无余温。

  • 闻人蕴涵 9小时前 :

    原来说的是Rent的作者,失敬失敬,这么多年了也没去Broadway看一场。加菲演技时刻,这几年选片都很棒。以及,在这个节点上看一个纽约客步入30真的太有共鸣了!They're singing, "Happy birthday"

  • 雯彦 0小时前 :

    好厉害啊,跨界做电影导演也做的这么好,果然优秀的人做什么都很优秀

  • 月正 1小时前 :

    过分戏剧化,隐隐约约能看到很多好莱坞传记片的影子。但真情实感被感动,眼泪不值钱。音乐也是真好听。

  • 锺离海逸 3小时前 :

    加菲发力 好看 感人 永远保持着纯真的人真可爱

  • 林晨涛 1小时前 :

    各方面都令人想要和《爱乐之城》对比。但本片无论是音乐上还是对爱情与梦想之间挣扎的表现,都差了许多。

  • 采彦 8小时前 :

    石头姐有《爱乐之城》,现在加菲有《倒数时刻》了。其实开始有点get不到这个略神经质的拉森,但后半集完全被感动了,幻想女友演唱那首泳池里憋出的单曲,还有和michael的神仙友谊,以及最后跟女友的重逢都很戳。加菲把一个有点jerk的艺术家塑造的很好

加载中...

Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved