Two differences between this Austrian version and the generally available American version are immediately obvious: they differ both in their length and in the language of the intertitles. The American version is only 1,883 metres long - at 18 frames per second a difference of some 7 minutes to the Austrian version with 2,045 metres. Whereas we originally presumed only a negligible difference, resulting from the varying length of the intertitles, a direct comparison has nevertheless shown that the Austrian version differs from the American version both in the montage and in the duration of individual scenes. Yet how could it happen that the later regional distribution of a canonical US silent film was longer than the "original version"?
The prevalent American version of Blind Husbands does not correspond to the version shown at the premiere of 1919. This little-known fact was already published by Richard Koszarski in 1983. The film was re-released by Universal Pictures in 1924, in a version that was 1,365 feet (416 metres) shorter. At 18 frames per second, this amounts to a time difference of 20 minutes! "Titles were altered, snippets of action removed and at least one major scene taken out entirely, where von Steuben and Margaret visit a small local chapel." (Koszarski)
From the present state of research we can assume that all the known American copies of the film derive from this shortened re-release version, a copy of which Universal donated to the Museum of Modern Art in 1941. According to Koszarski the original negative of the film was destroyed sometime between 1956 and 1961 and has therefore been irretrievably lost. This information casts an interesting light on the Austrian version, which can be dated to the period between the summer of 1921 and the winter of 1922. Furthermore, the copy is some 200 metres longer than the US version of 1924. If one follows the details given by Richard Koszarski and Arthur Lennig, this means that, as far as both its date and its length are concerned, the Austrian version lies almost exactly in the middle between the (lost) version shown at the premiere and the re-released one.A large part of the additional length of the film can be traced to cuts that were made to the 1924 version in almost every shot. Koszarski describes how the beginning and the end of scenes were trimmed, in order to "speed up" the film. However, more exciting was the discovery that the Austrian version contains shots that are missing in the American one - shots/countershots, intertitles - and furthermore shows differences in its montage (i.e. the placing of the individual shots within a sequence). All this indicates that Die Rache der Berge constitutes the oldest and most completely preserved material of the film.
主线剧情不知道讲了啥，但是父子情的故事仍然打动我了。“和过去的自己并肩作战”这个idea特别好，也基本上是本片唯一的亮点；只是这一亮点基本上全在预告片里说完了。
不会有什么期待的故事，既然是轻喜剧，那就既没有恶搞的纯粹彻底，也没有科幻动作的惊险刺激，就是冲着演员们脸熟随便看看。
2.虽然快睡着了，但是和孩子一起看动画片真好
想不到浩克和詹妮弗在《女孩梦三十》隔了多年后又一起饰演CP🉑🉑🉑不过詹妮弗真的老了~佐伊是妆容问题，也老了很多，岁月饶过谁🍃
—“真不敢相信你是未来的我”
陪神兽去影院观看的。我个人一直都蛮喜欢萌鸡小队的，觉得它三观正常、画面和音乐精良，配音生动，是国产动画里称得上优秀的系列作品。这部电影对母子、父子亲情的表达直观细腻，也直击人心。另外坏猫咪和老鼠父子都很有意思。
瑞安现在演谁都是小贱贱……噢～原来小贱贱的爸爸是浩克（笑）
2.虽然快睡着了，但是和孩子一起看动画片真好
这就是一部爽片不爽的代表作，额……也没啥说的了吧。
ryan Reynolds真的走不出这个路线了哈哈哈跟Netflix拍快手片+1... 还有hulk+gamora这是什么家庭
及格水平的合家欢电影。跟科幻关系不大，主要还是讲家庭和亲情。
绿巨人给死侍当爹，卡魔拉给死侍当老婆，漫威演员再就业也不用这么汇聚一堂吧，剧情也挺那一套流水线的，居然还有脸Q星战和回到未来。不过绿巨人跳起来砸死侍脸属实给我笑疯了哈哈哈哈。
哈哈哈哈哈哈说话很多的男主好讨喜，无论是小朋友还是大人。Superhero landing 笑到了。父亲抱着儿子说“我爱你”的时候好感动。
前边不错，与母亲酒吧对话那段很感动，加一星，中后就太无聊了，，感情戏拍的多好啊 干嘛瞎拍那么多毫无创新的俗套科幻动作戏呢
三星半吧，配着大鸡腿子香骨鸡鸡架锁骨鲜芋仙特别下饭
这个导演的作品（博物馆系列，失控玩家，铁甲钢拳）都很喜爱，但是这一部属实是一般，又一部RR式电影
瑞安现在演谁都是小贱贱……噢～原来小贱贱的爸爸是浩克（笑）
十分普通…科幻得很一般，剧情单一扁平，逻辑混乱，时空穿越的点完全没有新意，模板式剧本，看到前面就知道结局是啥了…然后一定要吐槽Sorian的年轻版本的CG做得比爵迹还假还吓人…
比亚马逊去年星爵的那个《明日之战》要好，贱贱刷宝只要对话写好基本上都不会难看，小孩子活泼俏皮很搭戏，明显有参照《怪奇物语》。非常保守温情的配方，但家是爱之源，父子情写的也很棒，谁不想穿越回去揍老爸一拳再给老妈一个最深情的拥抱呢。最难得是没滥用老歌串烧，回去后跟爱人相逢很让人羡慕。喜欢散步，经常去湖边，特别希望遇到一个同龄的单身，打个招呼，聊天合拍，然后从朋友开始处，很无奈湖边散步的都是爷爷奶奶们了，年轻人都行色匆匆。晚上看的蛮欢乐的，开头小机灵鬼跟妈妈贫嘴讲的一句“I love you more than I know” 写的真好，好撩。|Netflix
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
