American psychologist John Holden arrives in London to participate in a symposium aiming to expose witchcraft and devil-worship as a fraud, with attention centered on a cult run by a Julian Karswell. Debarking his plane, Holden learns that the symposium leader, Henry Harrington, has suddenly died and he is now in charge. What only the audience knows is that Harrington was clearly killed by a demon, apparently summoned by Karswell to avenge his persecution. Despite both threatening and cajoling behavior by Karswell, Holden determines to proceed, though the only cult member willing to talk about his experiences is in a prison psychiatric ward, catatonic after allegedly killing yet another cult member. However, Harrington's niece, Joanna, believes, based on her uncle's notes, that Karswell may indeed have some satanic powers derived from an ancient tome in an obscure language which he has been able to translate, and attempts to warn the skeptic Holden. Karswell's mother also attempts to warn Holden off. However, the thing which begins to most get to Holden are the occasional, but mounting, sensory and mental disturbances he begins experiencing after an encounter with Karswell, and the discovery that, during this encounter, Karswell secretly slipped a slip of parchment with a curse in runic symbols on it into Holden's belongings, a parchment identical to one Harrington recorded having had passed to him in a similar manner shortly before his death... [N.B. Holden at no point stays at the Karswell estate].
悬疑，青春，友情，爱情，亲情。青春没有无意义的事，泪目。
7.5分。印度版本的《辩护人》，这个评价还是挺高的。故事本身拍得并不是太精彩，舞台感很强，但一想到这竟然是真实事件改编，就感觉背上发凉。说到底印度的种姓制度至今还在影响着印度的社会，这种顽疾何时能够清除，现在还看不到尽头。。。
虽然有很多程式化的印度电影镜头，但基于真实事件的扎实剧本和合理的表演，给了电影非常棒的观感。即使可以猜到其中角色的遭遇，也会好奇会如何推进。
剧场版一定得春日部防卫队集体出场才有意思，再加上选题，破案过程比隔壁的柯南剧场版强太多了，柯南就知道买日常
这世界本就是弱肉强食，但是也不能为此就放弃朋友啊。
出乎意料的不错！热血，青春，感动，反内卷反内耗，卷到最后才发现错过了青春其他精彩的东西
“伊鲁拉人直到今天仍因虚假指控而被监禁。”PS：这似乎是印共（马）拍的电影，钱德鲁律师似乎是一位共产党员。另外因此去了解了一下印共，真是让人刮目相看。8
它是真实事件改编，我为这份真实而感动。但是对于印度真正的底层人民而言有多少人能看到这部电影，有多少人能因此改变。这更像是顶层人民的自我夸耀，希望能多做些实事吧
有足够戏剧张力的真实故事应该这样拍，导演控制的算节制，也没在手法上扯幺蛾子，表演调的也舒服. 能拍出这样的电影很振奋人心，好评！
直击20世纪90年代印度阶级社会不平等现象，揭露其阶级优越性和黑金政治相融合的劣根性问题。佩鲁马尔萨米：“为了坚持民主，总得有某些时代的人成为独裁者，这是真理。”冠冕堂皇，美其名曰，大言不惭。威胁，恐吓，伪造案件，民主的外衣掩盖不了执法暴力的本质。还好他还有良知，还好正义只是迟到，不是缺席。
3- 比起灵感出自东野圭吾的《较量》（《误杀》原版）可是差得远了，题材形式（且那歌词直白得恨不能掐死全人类的想象力）都不新鲜，故事或纪录哪边都不靠着。
赢在题材！要是中国能拍，就没印度什么事了！套路化的电影，带着熟悉的传统且尬入的配乐节奏。比穷和不公更可悲的，就是一代代延续着这毫无希望的贫穷。
剧情一般但是立意非常棒！反精英至上主义，人生不能只是为了打分机器下的无脑高分！
误杀3有了，印度政府怎么放任这些辱印电影全世界传播？
讳疾忌医会病入膏肓，早日敢于正视或还有治愈的希望
片子是好片子，但拍的确实太累赘了，昏昏欲睡
根据真实故事改编，让人又相信了理想主义，虽然电影难免会用煽情和英雄弧光来表现这样的题材，但能被允许拍下来至少还不是毫无希望，同时能呼吁更多的人去关注少数族群被忽视的权益，故事难得还保证了推理的逻辑性，在追逐真相与公平的路上残酷现实暴露狰狞面容，所以法庭戏才会更显酣畅。
赢在题材！要是中国能拍，就没印度什么事了！套路化的电影，带着熟悉的传统且尬入的配乐节奏。比穷和不公更可悲的，就是一代代延续着这毫无希望的贫穷。
黑警虽然可恨，种姓制度虽然让人愤怒，但起码律师上街不会被寻衅滋事，农妇维权不会被恶意上访，高等法院判案不需要看谁脸色。
讨厌啦因为我现在一定要赢过风间才行。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
