Constantly on the hunt and suffering from hallucinations that drive his violent nature, an unnamed man is capturing women and savagely beating them to death. Meanwhile, a woman is luring men into a violent end, by way of her knife. Driven by the same force to make the opposite sex suffer, the killers’ fates intertwine. The two must face off in a battle to the death, in which they are forced to reveal the horrible truth behind their addiction to murder.
“Brutal” takes an interesting approach to its visuals, drawing heavy influence from Western “Grindhouse” films, using a filter to make the footage appear grainy, damaged, and with light and color fluctuations. Unfortunately, the visual styling ends up feeling misguided, as other than applying the filter it does not imitate any other aspects of the “Grindhouse” genre. Despite trying to dirty up the film, it is apparent it was shot on digital. The cinematography is also a step above most “Grindhouse” productions, with Takashi Hirose proving he has talent behind the camera. Exterior shots to those taking place in small spaces are all competently framed, lit, and transition well. The decision to add an effect on top of the work hurts the film’s imagery and even gives a sense of desperation to try to capture a certain type of nostalgia with the audience, instead of relying on its own strengths. It is unfortunate when one creative choice can hurt a production so much.
The story of “Brutal” is simple but effective, it does attempt some sort of social commentary about the violent nature of men and women, but it does not offer enough depth into the subject to justify the amount of violence on display. The film does end on a strong note with an interesting twist, with a reveal that is bound to gross some out, while giving others a chuckle. In spite of its simple nature, those who enjoy films that make them somewhat uncomfortable and enjoy the challenge of getting through some ultra-violence, “Brutal” poses a fun and entertaining challenge in that regard.
旧瓶新酒➕第四面墙 period drama改编百试百灵 轻松聪慧完全不别扭 Dakota好灵好灵！后半段有点强行圆回来那味儿 但总的来说enjoyable！英国人witty给我看！
为了推动剧情冒出好多不合理的情节！说灾难不灾难！说喜剧也没多少笑点！和《隧道》没法比！最后强行煽情给我整不会了！
以前写过关于劝导的论文，非常喜欢这版的电影改编——其中有很多后现代主义的设置让人惊喜，独白和对话里有强烈的女性主义意识。故事情节引发了我的共鸣，台词和Anne跟观众的眼神互动里有典型的简奥斯丁式反讽，喜欢有浓厚当代色彩的改编。
改编简奥斯汀的影视作品，男主不够帅就是原罪（¯\_(ツ)_/¯）除了人物设定OOC，男女主毫无化学反应，甚至感觉跟表哥更有火花...
还以为是什么美食美景与爱的风光片，美食和风光了了几个镜头，男主刚出场就暴走很不讨喜，但女主出场时更讨人厌，爱情展开也十分奇怪，女主和男主从头吵到尾，突然地女主在和未婚夫的订婚前一晚和男主搞上了……
既然都加入这么多现代元素了，不妨可以把背景放到现代吧。流水账的剧本和不伦不类的服装，有点浪费了美景和配乐。ps.男主角长得有点丑😰
不同往常灾难片煽情一绝，想用喜剧的方式拍出来，可是啥啥都不行！灾难不行，逃生不行，喜剧不行，温情也不行，跟闹着玩儿一样。
轻喜剧。女主艳光四射，全赖配角统统歪瓜裂枣衬托。而且，一个白人，在奥斯丁时代，有这么多各肤色的亲友也挺难入戏的。
把我心中神圣的Persuasion拍成这样，我也只能说，Netflix, not surprising. 达妹真的是一如既往的让人失望。我就活该看了。
3.5吧，笑中带泪，不细究，仅作为家庭电影足够了
制造的场景很棒，走的是轻松喜剧风格。没有尔虞我诈，只有互相帮忙，挺好的，后面凭着小黄罐冲出生天的主意真好 ，还结合了一对住单房的单身狗（ 挺开心的～
比 A Good Year 差一截。有意大利和美食这两个元素本应该是全垒打才是。
●“女人的特权就是专情”——真尼玛无聊。你是谁啊就代表女人。
金社长真的演啥都很强完全不跳戏
劝导女主的长辈是黑人，女主妹夫是半黑人，女主堂哥是黄种人，现在欧美电影的选角已经政治正确的离谱了
●最后结局，俩人腻歪。
摄影和美术赏心悦目，比以往的版本都更“电影”，但是这改编也太《伦敦生活》了吧？
还蛮好看的，前面的部分还很好笑，承豪好帅啊，他爸也痞帅痞帅的。但是大男孩引小男孩走出去的时候，一下子又灵异了，感觉怪怪的😂
编剧不觉得深沉克制的爱永远与现代思潮格格不入吗
抛开zzzq的选角不说，通常简奥斯汀改编的电影都挺打动我的，但这部电影没有，挺喜欢达妹和亨利的颜，达妹的英音应该是美国人英国人听了都沉默的那种，亨利就……，渣男体质吧，想起了一个小忙里他。
Copyright © 2015-2023 All Rights Reserved
